[ISF][MICHAEL TLV]
ISF/M-TLV Calibration Report Version 2.0
Something New, Something Old
The Art of Presenting Grayscale Calibration Work To The Public
<< Back to Calibrators
Page 1 | Page
2
(Jan 17, 2003)
Greetings
This is just a brief update on where I am with the
grayscale calibration template that I developed. The
original version has had about four to five months now to circulate amongst the various
ISF professionals out there and I have gotten some very constructive feedback on some
changes that might improve the form.
Well, with the assistance and input of Mel at
DavLyn HTC and Doug Weil at Clearly Resolved Image & Sound, I’ve been able to
update the form to do a bit more than what it originally did. The visual scatter graph has now been added that
really helps to illustrate the X and Y coordinates that we were recording. I had wanted to add the scatter graph at the
beginning, but my graphing making skills were not so great in Excel.
I’ve done away with the total distance
summary at the bottom and now use an average distance calculation instead to give you an
average on how far off things were and where they end up.
Also added is a bias-tint column for the pre-calibration numbers as well.
The entire form is formatted on an Excel
spreadsheet and will print out fully on one sheet of paper for easy presentation. I recommend that the sheet be presented in colour
form though as that is more appealing to look at.
As an added bonus, there is a second sheet
attached to the main spreadsheet which I have customized for Black & White films and a
colour temperature setting of 5400K. For
those doing the off set for this mode, just select the second sheet and repeat the process
based on the new X and Y coordinates for B/W material.
Think of this as the ISF/M-TLV Calibration Report
Version 2.0. As always, I welcome input and
suggestions that might further improve the format.
Regards
Michael TLV writes:
Up until now, magazines and other information sources on Grayscale
calibration presented results to a small, but curious public in the form of Grayscale
graphs charting the colour temperature versus various intensities of gray. A sample of such a chart is shown below. We see these in all the home theatre magazines and
some ISF calibrators provide their customers with something similar called the ISF
calibration report where the primary focus is on the big before versus after graph.
Now by itself, the graph is a nice visual
presentation of the TV’s grayscale tracking before calibration and after calibration. Now here comes the problem. The grayscale graph is a gross simplification of
the grayscale calibration process and the science behind what is being done. (Although
actually doing a grayscale is not that difficult with the proper tools.) It is presented in this graphical format because
it is feared that the public cannot grasp anything slightly more complex about grayscale
calibration and the basic theory behind it.
I bring this up because on not so rare occasions,
the information presented on the graph is often extremely misleading. I have described the grayscale calibration graph
to my clients as being something akin to a 2-D representation of something that is 3-D. I draw a sphere on a piece of paper and it looks
like a circle. As a result, just because
something looks close on a colourful graph may not actually mean anything. A blunt and extreme example that I like to use is
to place your thumb into the night sky right next to the full moon.
From a two dimensional perspective, your thumb is
now as large as the moon and possibly bigger. As
such, can we walk away and conclude that the moon is not very large at all? In a two dimensional universe, the answer would be
“yes.” Of course we inhabit a
three dimensional universe so the answer is “no,” because we know that there is
also a “Z” axis in three dimensional space. X,Y,Z coordinates in real space. Width, Height and Depth …
The grayscale charts that we see in magazines
simply do not do justice to the grayscale calibration theory. And often times, a client will misinterpret these
same grayscale graphs and conclude that his TV was so closely tracking grayscale out of
the box than he did not really need to hire you in the first place. Yes, there are cases where some TVs really are
close from the factory, but this has been fairly rare and so far, continues to be rare. It’s just that sinking feeling that one
gets when his client misunderstands the grayscale chart information. When this happens, you can end up with an unhappy
client and everything goes sour on you (doubtful, but possible).
I
want to bring in a few exhibits here that are gross exaggerations, but do, hopefully, get
the point across. The grayscale calibration chart sample below represents the major
deficiency of the current graphical presentation method. We have a case where the
pre-calibration grayscale tracking appears to closely resemble the post calibration
grayscale tracking.
The reaction from the uneducated public would be
that the TV in question was pretty accurate out of the box and that the calibrator
probably did not have to do very much if anything at all to fix this. This is what a graph shows you … and this is
what the image actually looked like before calibration versus after calibration.
It is nearly impossible for the
home theatre publications to present to us what the actual image looks like on the TV. Hence we have the grayscale calibration charts
that are easy to translate to print. Now the
pre-calibration image of the resident Furry Pig is quite simply … all wrong. It is too green.
The post calibrated image is pretty much where the image should be and yet
the graph doesn’t show this at all. This
is why the calibrated grayscale graph that we see in magazines have the potential to also
be terribly misleading. Good data presented
the wrong way can lead to unfortunate and erroneous conclusions.
Of course the fact that I am presenting images on
a web site also introduces a plethora of potential errors.
The irony of this fact did dawn on me.
All images are therefore presented for illustration purposes only. I have to figure that even the poorest tuned
computer monitors out there will at least be able to show the reader that the two images
of the Furry Pig look distinctly different. How
that difference is manifested on the screen, I have no idea.
From the two-dimensional perspective, it is the
same as your thumb being as big as the moon. Now
imagine that you can see 12 inches behind the graph and 12 inches in front of it. The further behind the graph you go, the greener
your image becomes. The further in front you
get, the more red/purple the image becomes. The
green pre-calibration Furry Pig is actually located six inches behind the graph. The post calibration Furry Pig is located on the
graph itself. The idea in calibration is to
get the curve onto the surface of the graph itself too, not in front or in back. This is what D6500K is all about. There are lots of 6500K readings both in front of
the chart as well as behind it. Sometimes,
the curious public loses sight of this and simply gets focused on the magic 6500K number
thinking that it is only the number 6500 that is all important.
Page 1 | Page 2
|
